Raise your hand if you’ve seen The Terminator.
Okay. You can’t see it, but everyone on Earth has an arm in the air.
So, people of Earth—how many of you actually remember the last time you watched Arnold’s breakout performance?
Who sat next to you? Did you arrive by carriage or dirigible?
If you can’t remember, lower that hand.
I ask because the rewatch pays off.
This was my first time seeing the film, so my dad and I instant-streamed T1 on Netflix. And let me tell you—it’s glorious.
As soon as Arnold starts gunning down civilians, my dad blurts out, “I don’t remember him being the bad guy.”
Turns out he never saw the first one. He just thinks he did. And I bet that’s true for half the folks who kept their hands raised.
Thirty years after its release, the film still holds up better than you’d expect.
The Terminator is smarter than most modern action flicks. I’m glad I waited to see it.
Every character feels airtight. Major or minor, the performances keep you locked in between the bursts of violence.
The cops—Traxler and Vukovich—played by Paul Winfield and Lance Henriksen (a.k.a. Bishop from Aliens) have a great rhythm. Sarah’s roommate, Bess Motta as Ginger, plays the sexy bouncer type. Her boyfriend? A well-meaning oaf. Kyle Reese, played by Michael Biehn, shows up withdrawn and intense.
And then there’s Linda Hamilton as Sarah Connor—what an ass-kicking delight. Her legacy lives on 24 years later in Fox’s The Sarah Connor Chronicles, which ran for two seasons and starred the endlessly underrated Lena Headey.
That’s one hell of a badge of honor for Hamilton’s performance.
Taken alone, the story hits hard. It doesn’t even need a sequel, though the ending leaves that door cracked. But it stands perfectly well without one.
Its one major flaw? The same misstep that haunts other sci-fi flicks—Escape from New York, Event Horizon—namely, badly underestimating the timeframe. This movie places its “future” in 2029. We’ve got fifteen years to invent laser guns, synthetic skin, and advanced AI?
Oh—and time travel.
Still, no point nitpicking that. The plot stays self-contained. The rules fit the world it builds. Skynet launches in 1997 and evolves at a pace that makes suspension of disbelief feel totally reasonable.
Ironically, the film plays like a horror movie. I’ll get to that in a bit.
But first—The Terminator is a must-see, the same way The Great Gatsby is a must-read.
If your hand’s still up, maybe stop reading here. The rest of this dives deep into spoiler territory.
This film is full of nuance. Every moment feels intelligently crafted and deliberately placed.
Example: The answering machine message says, “machines need love too”—which obviously foreshadows Sarah’s showdown with the Terminator. It also nods to the larger theme of man’s relationship with machines and the fate that follows.
Another layer: the nightclub where the Terminator finds Sarah is called “Tech-Noir.” That name pokes fun at itself. The visuals channel noir, and the core narrative is peak science fiction.
The story keeps itself grounded through the lens of 1984. A terminator really would need to rifle through a phone book and kill every Sarah Connor in sequence to complete the mission. That detail gives the protagonist just enough distance from her hunter to create tension.
And when you throw in little survival tricks—like using dogs to sniff out machines—it makes humanity’s resistance more believable.
The effects mostly hold up. Anyone with a brain and some context will see past the dated green screen or rubbery CGI. For the time, it’s solid work.
Alright—let’s talk timeline.
Timeline A = Kyle Reese’s original future, the world up to 2029.
Timeline B = the reality of this film, Earth in 1984.
Presumably, John Connor from Timeline A wasn’t fathered by Kyle Reese, right? A terminator didn’t show up in that 1984 to try and kill Sarah?
So I guess Timeline A splits off and becomes irrelevant. Timeline B now takes over and continues into its own version of the future.
Strangely, no ripple effects appear yet—no chaos, no paradox fallout. Just a neat little fork in the road.
The biggest consequence? John’s lineage splits. He becomes half-A, half-B.
I wonder if the sequel will address that. When 2029 arrives in Timeline B, will Reese need to time-travel again and impregnate Sarah all over?
My brain hurts.
Anyway—the film’s horror structure deserves credit. Sarah’s doom hangs overhead from start to finish. Death stalks her around every corner. I won’t rehash the entire plot, but think about how often she nearly dies.
After surviving the police station massacre, Reese dies destroying the Terminator’s legs—and even then, the thing still crawls after her. She finally kills it by crushing it in a hydraulic press—just as its fingers reach her face.
That’s terror pushed to the brink. Again. And again.
If your hand’s still in the air, feel free to lower it now.
If nothing else, you burned a few calories. And maybe learned two things about yourself:
You’re easy to manipulate. And…
You’ve got exquisite taste in movie reviews.
★★★★★ ★★★★★
Briefer takes at IMDb & Letterboxd.
Discover more from Stephen Tier
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.